潘德夫：范戴克那次手球应该是点球，裁判决定了比赛的结果（潘德夫：范戴克手球应判点，裁判的判罚左右了比赛结果）

Considering user's request

The user shared a message in Chinese, quoting Pandev about a handball incident involving Van Dijk. This likely relates to the match's outcome and could need my commentary or a summary. I should include details about the incident, context of the match, and perhaps analyze the handball rules and refereeing decisions. It might help to clarify which match this refers to, especially given that Pandev retired in 2021. I'll pull my thoughts together for a concise analysis.Analyzing handball incidents

I’m considering the handball incident in the Netherlands vs. Turkey Euro 2024 quarterfinal. There was a potential handball when a Turkish cross hit either Dumfries or Ake. I remember it happening late in the game around 90'+. Dumfries is a wingback, and there was also a Turkish header hitting the arm of Ake or Van Dijk. I’m mixing up some details here—perhaps I should confirm this is about the Euro match and not an unrelated one.Clarifying handball details

I'm thinking about the handball incident related to Pandev and Van Dijk. Netherlands faced North Macedonia in Euro 2020, but Van Dijk missed that tournament due to injury, so he couldn't have committed a handball there. I might consider the Italy vs. Netherlands match in the Nations League instead. To keep it clear, I should provide a general analysis of handball laws and mention how it's tough to be definitive without video evidence. I'll ask the user to specify which match and minute they mean.Evaluating potential handball incidents

It seems the user might want an evaluation on a specific handball incident. If it's about the Euro 2024 quarterfinal Netherlands vs. Turkey, I could mention the moment in question and relevant considerations from Law 12. Many believe no penalty was warranted due to the arm's position and unexpected deflection. Another scenario could be the Netherlands vs. England semifinal, where a penalty was given for a high boot.

To stay clear, I’ll explain handball criteria, how VAR judges incidents, and highlight that referees’ decisions can be complex. I'll ask the user for specific match details to provide a precise verdict. Bullet points outlining Law 12 would be helpful too, covering criteria like arm position, distance, and speed.Discussing handball criteria

I'm thinking about how incidental contact or close-range deflections can reduce culpability in a handball situation. Post-2021 rule changes mean accidental handballs that lead to disallowed goals are less of an issue, but defenses are still penalized for making their bodies appear bigger. I should suggest that if the user provides a clip or time, we could analyze it frame-by-frame for clarity.

I’ll keep the tone collaborative and provide examples, like how a blocked shot by an extended arm would lead to a penalty, while a close arm supporting the body may not. I’ll also mention the VAR threshold of "clear and obvious." Plus, I think it would be good to respond in Chinese to match the user's language!